Change the Mississippi state flag

I just sent this to the governor of my state:

Governor Bryant,

I urge you to take a firm stand and lead our state to adopt a new state flag.

I am a white, conservative, sixth generation Mississippian, who also happens to have voted Republican 95% of the time over the past 40 years. I am tired of offending a large number of my fellow Mississippians, and, now, unintentionally aligning our state with bigoted haters by continuing to fly the current state flag. You keep insisting on “letting the voters decide.” This seems to me like an indefensible double standard. Using your “let the voters decide,” approach, we should just do away with the legislature, and just govern by popular vote, putting matters such as the state budget and traffic laws to a vote by the general electorate.

I know you know that we don’t live in that kind of a pure democracy because it is unworkable. We elected you and the members of the legislature to lead. Start leading by following Sen. Wicker’s advice: put the current flag in a museum, and design and adopt a new flag of unity for Mississippi.

Don’t fall into the trap that previous “leaders” of this state fell into. It is inevitable that this change is going to happen, just like it was inevitable that segregation would end. The outside pressure on the state, including economic pressure, will become too great. The longer you wait, the worse the state looks to those outside the state. And, the longer you wait, the more likely that history will associate you with the likes of Ross Barnett rather than leaders, such as William Winter, who could see the future and strove to lead their fellow Mississippians to forge a better more unified Mississippi.

Our democracy depends on compromise

Compromise is not a dirty word when it comes to politics. In fact, the United States Constitution prescribes a form of government that requires political compromise in order for the government to operate at all. Separation of powers between legislative, executive, and judicial branches along with the requirement that every single law, including every single budget bill, must pass both the House and the Senate ensures that almost no one is ever going to get exactly what they want. Instead, our system demands that, in order to make any change to the status quo, our representatives must settle for legislative sausage that isn’t exactly what they think tastes best but is nonetheless better than the putrid mess that will continue to sit on our plates if there is no compromise.

Two opinion pieces appeared in the Wall Street Journal last month that accurately described an example of what happens when congressmen, senators, and the purists among their constituents forget the necessity of political compromise.

Fred Barnes wrote on July 17th about the Republicans inability to repeal and replace ObamaCare:

“Politics is a team sport, and Republicans are playing it poorly….This is an example of why legislative success depends on operating as a team. You don’t abandon your team just because you don’t get everything you want (or want left out). You hold your nose and vote for an imperfect measure, sometimes merely because it’s politically beneficial and better than the alternative.”

On July 20th, Karl Rove wrote:

“….dissenting Republican legislators, by opposing either the Senate bill or the House version, would leave all of ObamaCare intact and all of its problems unsolved. The rebels have let the incomplete be the enemy of the good.”

Consider a different example. Should those of us who believe abortion is wrong and should be illegal only support legislation that completely outlaws abortion? Isn’t it better to support compromise legislation that puts some limits on abortion, for example, the requirement that the parents of minors seeking abortions should be notified? Isn’t a half loaf better than no loaf at all?

Purists of all political persuasions need to realize that, given our form of government, holding out for a majority of the body politic to come around to your exact point of view is a recipe for no improvement whatsoever to the status quo and the continued weakening and decay of our republic.

Rain…and then more rain

From the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Real-Time Weather Data website click here for the Slidell, Louisiana radar loop from  9PM Friday (02Z 23 Jun) to 9AM Saturday (14Z 24 Jun).

Here in Picayune, almost every shower that came through was a heavy downpour. These showers added over three inches to the 6+ inches we had accumulated since Tropical Storm Cindy started soaking us on Tuesday. So, now our grand total is over nine inches.

Yesterday’s numerical model guidance missed this latest round of rain, and therefore forecasters pretty much missed it also. Finally, last night the National Weather Service’s Weather Prediction Center (WPC) realized that we were at risk for getting more heavy rain, and issued a Mesoscale Precipitation Discussion at 9:35 PM CDT saying so.

At 4:00 AM this morning, the WPC issued another Mesoscale Precipitation Discussion raising the alarm for our area and admitting, “THE MESOSCALE GUIDANCE, OUTSIDE OF THE 00Z SPC WRF AND 07Z HRRR,HAS COMPLETELY MISSED OUT ON THIS ACTIVITY OR IS WAY TOO SLOW IN THEIR FORWARD PROGRESSION.”

But, why should those of us around Picayune complain about a mere 9-10 inches? Looks like the “winner” for most rainfall since all this began with Cindy is a strip from Ocean Springs northward with 17+ inches. In fact, some CoCoRaHs observers in Jackson County have recorded even more, with the grand prize winner getting 20.21 inches!

The NWS in Slidell is giving us an 80 percent chance of rain today, but that may be a little too wet. As of noon the radar is very quiet, and the mesoscale HRRR model isn’t predicting much for this afternoon (although, admittedly, it didn’t do well with last night’s system). Maybe the storms early this morning stabilized the atmosphere enough to give us a break.

But…the HRRR does show more showers moving into south Mississippi early this evening and tonight.

The good news? MUCH drier air is on the way, and the models are showing it getting to south Mississippi Sunday night and hanging around until at least Tuesday and maybe Wednesday. Hurray.

Hurricane Questions & Answers

Here are some common questions and answers regarding hurricanes that I wrote specifically for readers of the The Picayune Item and The Poplarville Democrat in Pearl River County, Mississippi. They appeared in a special Hurricane Preparedness section of those newspapers published on May 31, 2017.

Both tropical storms and hurricanes have names. What is the difference?

Tropical low pressure systems, known as depressions, are given names and upgraded to tropical storms when maximum sustained winds increase above 39 mph. They become hurricanes when sustained winds reach 75 mph or greater.

What are “sustained” winds?

Winds are turbulent, and winds at the surface are particularly gusty. Winds over land are even more turbulent than over open water. Sustained wind refers to the one-minute average wind speed at a location. For example, during a one-minute period the wind speed may vary from 80 to 100 to 90 to 105 mph, resulting in a “sustained” wind speed of 94 mph.

What do the different categories of hurricanes mean?

The Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale’s five categories correspond to the extent and type of wind damage caused at different sustained wind speeds. Category One winds (75-95 mph) are dangerous, but they cause the least amount of damage among the five categories. At the upper end of the scale, Category Five winds (greater than 154 mph) are the worst and can cause catastrophic damage to many many buildings.

A change of one mile per hour can change a hurricane’s wind category. In reality there isn’t much difference in the wind threat from hurricanes in the upper range of one category and the lower range of the next higher category.

Hurricanes are assigned a category based on their maximum sustained winds. Most of the winds in the hurricane will be less than the maximum sustained speed, and some gusts will be higher.

Also, these categories do not say anything about hurricanes’ deadliest threat, which is storm surge. For example, a hurricane with Category Three winds that cover a large area can produce a storm surge that causes catastrophic water damage in coastal flood zones.

What are the eye and eyewall?

The eye is a circular area 5 to 50 miles in diameter in the center of the hurricane’s circulation where the winds are light or calm. There is little or no rain and skies directly overhead may even be clear. The lowest atmospheric pressure in the hurricane is found in the eye.

Surrounding the eye is the eyewall, a ring of extremely intense thunderstorms containing the hurricane’s strongest winds.

Air in the lower levels of the atmosphere spins counterclockwise around the hurricane center while also spiraling inward toward the low pressure of the eye. As the humid air nears the eyewall it moves upward in intense updrafts, releasing heat as water vapor condenses into liquid water in the clouds, a process that can further decrease the pressure in the eye and intensify the storm.

What goes up must come down. Some of the air begins to sink into the center of the storm, drying and warming as it sinks, resulting in the comparatively nice weather in the eye.

Because the eye is small compared to the size of the hurricane, most people who go through a hurricane will not go through the eye. If you do, remember, you will soon be back in the violent eyewall.

How big of an area do the winds cover in a hurricane?

Hurricanes come in many different sizes. The maximum winds reported in hurricane advisories are usually found in a relatively small area in the eyewall.

But, it can be a deadly mistake to equate a hurricane with the pinpoint location of the eye and its forecast track. Intense hurricane force winds can extend up to 100 miles outward from the eye. Winds less than hurricane force (75 mph) but greater than 40 mph can extend hundreds of mile from the center.

The wind field is almost always lopsided, extending further in some directions than others. Usually the strongest winds are found, and and extend out the furthest, in the right, front quadrant of the storm. For a northward moving hurricane this is the northeast quarter of the storm. This is why it can make a tremendous difference whether the eye moves west of us (bad) or east of us (not as bad).

Even if the eyewall comes right over us, won’t the winds in Pearl River County be much less than the maximum winds at the coast?

The sustained winds in Pearl River County definitely will be less than at the coastline. But, gusts could be as strong as the winds at the coast.

Also, tornados can be a serious threat, even in tropical storms and weak hurricanes, especially ahead of and to the right of the track of the eye.

Damage from high winds to mobile homes and other buildings and indirectly due to falling trees is the greatest threat to Pearl River County from hurricanes.

In Pearl River County do we have to worry about water from hurricanes?

Storm surge is not an issue for us. However, torrential rains can cause streams in our county to flood. Rains of 10-25 inches are possible from some tropical systems, including weak depressions or tropical storms.

How much can we trust hurricane forecasts?

The National Hurricane Center’s forecasts are accurate and timely enough that they have saved countless lives and billions of dollars in property damage over the past several decades.

Thanks to advances in satellites, aircraft-based instrumentation, numerical computer modeling, and a better understanding of hurricane dynamics, NHC’s 3-day forecast track has steadily improved from a not-very-helpful 300-mile average error in 1989 to a 75-mile average error last season. The 24-hour forecast average error has improved from 100 miles to 40 miles.

However, these are errors averaged over each hurricane season. Each hurricane is different, and the forecast track accuracy varies from storm to storm. In other words, 3-day forecasts for a particularly difficult-to-predict storm could still be several hundred miles.

Predicting intensification or weakening of tropical storms and hurricanes has turned out to be much harder than forecasting where the storms are headed.

When is the peak of hurricane season?

Hurricane season extends from June through November. Tropical storms and hurricanes have impacted the north-central Gulf Coast during each of those months. Our most serious threat is in August and September. With the one exception of an early July hurricane in 1916, all the major hurricanes impacting Pearl River County since the mid-1800s have hit between August 12th and October 3rd.

Will the 2017 hurricane season be a bad one?

People who get hit by a hurricane in 2017 will consider the season a bad one, even if that hurricane is the only one that forms all season long.

A better question might be, “How many hurricanes are there likely to be in the Atlantic, Caribbean and Gulf  of Mexico this season?” Several meteorological organizations have shown skill in answering this question in recent years. Their pre-season outlooks issued in March and April this year are that four to six hurricanes are likely to form in 2017. That is at or slightly below the long-term average. [UPDATE: I wrote that in mid-May; since then, several organizations have issued their early June updates. Those updates have been trending toward a more active season, in large part due to the decreasing likelihood that El Nino will kick in. The Barcelona Supercomputing Center and Colorado State University keep an updated summary of seasonal outlooks here.]

Should we evacuate?

The primary reason that people should evacuate ahead of an approaching hurricane is storm surge. Fortunately, storm surge is not an issue in our county.

However, there are still five reasons that residents of Pearl River County should consider for evacuating in advance of an approaching tropical storm or hurricane.

  1. You live in a mobile home. For all tropical storms and hurricanes, people in mobile homes should move to a stronger building away from the danger of falling trees. This might mean leaving the area or just riding out the storm with a neighbor down the street.
  2. You have trees close enough to fall on your house. Check the official National Weather Service forecasts and Hurricane Local Statements, both of which will be issued by the New Orleans/Baton Rouge Forecast Office in Slidell. If sustained winds higher than 75 mph are predicted for Pearl River County, and trees can reach your house, you should consider evacuating. The stronger the hurricane and the closer it is forecast to approach our county, the more seriously you should consider leaving your home for a safer location.
  3. Someone in your household has special medical needs that would be affected by an extended power outage. After major hurricanes, power might not be restored for days or even weeks.
  4. You live in an area prone to flooding from local creeks or branches. Heavy rains could cause flash flooding trapping you in your home.
  5. If a Category Four or Five hurricane is forecast to hit our area, even those with confidence in their well-built homes who do not have trees close enough to fall on the house, may want to consider evacuating the area. The strongest hurricanes can cause damage to even well-constructed buildings. Additionally, riding out the fury of a Category Four or Five hurricane can be a harrowing experience, even if your home suffers no major damage. And, the aftermath of power outages, gas shortages, and spotty phone service could prove difficult.

If you evacuate locally, which means you simply move to a local shelter or someone’s well-built house that you deem safer than your own, make sure to be in that safer location several hours before tropical storm force winds are forecast to arrive and trees may start falling.

If you do decide to evacuate outside the local area, the safest course of action is to move at least one hundred miles inland. Also, the further to the west of the forecast track you go, the lower the risk of experiencing severe weather. Keep in mind that for intense hurricanes, inland hotels can fill up quickly.

Once a tropical storm or hurricane is in the Gulf of Mexico, residents of Pearl River County should closely follow reliable weather information sources such as the websites for the National Hurricane Center and the National Weather Service Forecast Office in Slidell.

If a hurricane watch is issued for the Mississippi Gulf Coast, it means that hurricane conditions are possible in our area. It is possible, but still far from a certainty, that tropical storm force winds could reach our area in approximately 48 hours. As soon as the watch is issued is the time to finalize your plan of action. If that plan involves moving to a hotel inland, you may need to make reservations at this time.

If we are lucky, the hurricane watch will be dropped. If we are not so lucky, the hurricane watch will be changed to a hurricane warning for the Mississippi Gulf Coast. This means that forecasters have decided that hurricane conditions for the warned area are not just possible, but are likely to occur. Ideally, the National Weather Service issues a warning 36 hours before winds of 40 mph or greater are expected to reach the area. However, in some cases we might have less warning lead time, so pay close attention to the official warnings available on the National Weather Service websites.

Regardless, when a hurricane warning is issued, residents need to “pull the trigger” and execute their plan of action, whether that involves evacuation or riding out the storm in their homes.

The Religious Life of Robert E. Lee

After reading R. David Cox’s outstanding new biography, The Religious Life of Robert E. Lee, which examines Lee’s entire life with special attention to the role of the religious beliefs and practices of Lee and those around him, here’s what I think:

  1. Lee was a man of profound Christian faith. His trust in God’s providence and goodness grew greater and stronger throughout his life.
  2. Lee was a man a man of uncommon virtue. His Christian beliefs and practice were primary ingredients in the formation of his character, but Lee also seemed to absorb and integrate the best attributes of the culture of which he was a part, especially a devotion to duty, honor, and the dignity of others.
  3. No matter how good a person is, he is a product of, and to some degree a prisoner of, his culture.
  4. Character, virtue, and faith do not render us immune from believing lies. Lee, like many of his white American contemporaries, both Northern and Southern, believed that African-Americans were inherently inferior to whites.
  5. A godly Christian can make a decision that he firmly believes is the right, most ethical decision, only to discover later that his decision has placed him at cross-purposes with God’s overarching will. Lee was initially opposed to secession, and he believed that slavery was an evil that eventually should and would come to end. (Although he never offered a plan for how it should have been ended.). Nevertheless, when Lee resigned his U.S. Army commission and accepted command in the Confederate Army, he, like many of his fellow Southerners, believed he was making the best moral choice possible given the circumstances.
  6. Lee, like the overwhelming majority of his fellow Christians in the North and South—and for that matter, his fellow believers throughout Christian history—does not seem to have pondered very deeply the possibility that it might be against God’s will to continue to send tens of thousands of men to slaughter and be slaughtered even as Confederate defeat became increasingly likely. One of the criteria for a just war is a reasonable probability of success.
  7. What set Lee apart from many of his fellow Confederates was what he discerned regarding God’s will in the defeat of the Confederacy, a subject that Cox explores in detail. Soon after the end of the war, Lee met a friend, Marsena Patrick, who was a Union general. During an hour-long conversation, Lee reportedly said, “Patrick the only question on which we ever differed has been settled, and the Lord has decided against me.” At about the same time in 1865, Lee wrote to a friend:

    “God has thought fit to afflict us most deeply & his chastening hand is not yet stayed….How great must be our sins and unrelenting our obduracy….We have only to submit to his gracious will and pray for his healing mercy.”

  8. This understanding of the South’s defeat as a judgment of God did not leave Lee despondent. Instead, it formed the foundation upon which Lee embarked on the most admirable and noble mission of his life. From 1865 until his death in 1870, Lee led Washington College (now Washington and Lee University) located in the small town of Lexington in western Virginia. Not only did Lee save the college from closing its doors, he set the example of leading young men to embrace their identity as Americans and promoting reconciliation with the North. He continued to espouse unity even as his disappointment grew that Reconstruction was unfolding in a harsher way than what had been initially planned by Lincoln and initiated by Grant at Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. True to his Christian beliefs, Lee wanted the college to educate the young men under his charge, not only in a wide variety of practical and classical subjects, but also as followers of Christ: “I dread the thought of any student going away from the college without becoming a sincere Christian.”



Mother Tongue by Leonard Sweet

Is Mother Tongue a biography? Family memoir? Devotional meditation? Whatever the category, Mother Tongue is an inspiring remembrance of an amazing woman and an honest and engrossing recollection of Leonard Sweet’s mid-20th century growing-up years in a poor family led by his indomitable and devout mother, Mabel Boggs Sweet.

It is also a fascinating look inside the subculture of Holiness Churches of that era of which Ms. Mabel was an ordained, and then defrocked, minister. What made the story all the more compelling for me were the contrasts between the Len Sweet that I have come to know via his books, podcasts, and essays (and even a shared meal many years ago). Dr. Sweet is a sophisticated, urbane, scholar of American culture, college president, professor, semiotician (look it up!), and creative communicator extraordinaire. Although, I had inferred something of Sweet’s roots from passing allusions in his books and podcasts, I would never have guessed how humble his beginnings were, nor how saturated his formative years were in the Holiness stream of American Christianity.

Despite, however, Leonard Sweet’s impressive credentials and cosmopolitan persona, the singular trait that has always come through in his writing and speaking is his conviction that Jesus Christ is, as He claimed, the way, the truth, and the life. And, now, after reading this, his loving and respectful — although not entirely uncritical — portrait of Mabel Sweet, I know who planted and watered the seeds of Christian faith in Len Sweet.

Mabel Sweet’s life was in many ways a difficult life. I suspect that I’m not the only fellow follower of Christ who has read this book and wondered what might have been if she had been born in a different time and into different circumstances. But, in the end, most of us will join Len Sweet in thanking God that Mabel Sweet persevered and left the rich legacy that she did.

Wolf Willow – a portrait of the Plains

The short story embedded in the middle of Wolf Willow by Wallace Stegner is now one of my favorite short stories. And, the rest of the book, which was first published in 1955, is one of the best I’ve read during the past year.

Stegner spent part of his growing-up years in the small town of Eastend, Saskatchewan in the northern Great Plains just east of the Cypress Hills. In Wolf Willow, Stegner creates the fictional town of Whitemud, Saskatchewan as the surrogate setting for his remembrances.

The Plains are the book’s main character. The physical reality of the Plains always has the final word. The people who have lived there, or in some cases attempted to live there–Native Americans, metis (a people of mixed French and Indian heritage), cattle ranchers, wheat farmers–adapt as best they know how to the extreme weather, the lack of trees, the isolation, and a host of other factors that make this region something far less than ideal for human habitation.

A few “stickers” among the non-native settlers successfully adapt and stay on, and even a few of their children and grandchildren. But, for many of the Canadians and Americans who attempted to make a life on the northern Great Plains of Canada, in fact most of them if Stegner is to be believed, the harsh, grim, drought-prone, lonely Plains prove too inhospitable.

“The Whitemud River Range,” is the name of the short story found in the middle of the book. It is a dramatic tale of just how brutal the Plains can be. The story follows a band of cowboys through the early weeks of the frigid winter of 1906-07 as they attempt–again and again–to round up the cattle for their ranch and keep them from freezing. Eventually, in the teeth of a howling blizzard the task shifts to saving their own lives.

If that sounds like a Jack London short story set in northern Canada, well, there are some parallels. But, I much prefer this story of Stegner’s. Despite the grim setting, the cowboys are a more likable and more human collection of characters than those I’ve encountered in London’s stories.

Wolf Willow is hard to categorize with its mixture of memoir, history, geography, and fiction. I found it a fascinating mixture and a wonderful evocation of the spirit of a place where I’ve never been but which I am now unlikely to forget any time soon.

Identity politics leaves some of us speechless


Alan Jacobs captures my sentiments exactly:

     American politics is now nothing more than rival assertions of tribal identities. There are no Americans; there are no human beings; there are only instantiations of racial and sexual identities looting the store of our economic and cultural capital. In such a world the most ruthless bullies acquire more loot than everyone else. Tomorrow’s bullies will have a different set of policy proposals but will be temperamentally and morally identical to today’s.

When you’re ready to start the political conversation with by affirming that everyone in the room is a human being — not necessarily right about anything in particular, not necessarily good or even decent, but a human being in precisely the same sense that you are a human being, and that every single human being in this country should be subject to the same laws and norms enforced equally across the board, then get back to me. Until then, I don’t know what to say to you. I’m not refusing to speak; I just don’t know how to speak your identity-politics language without giving up everything I believe about humanity, and about what politics is for. — (Alan Jacobs, “Thought for Today,” on November 16, 2016, at his outstanding blog, Snakes and Ladders.)


Trump Wins – Michael Moore Was Right

I will elaborate on my very negative opinion of Michael Moore later in this post. But, when Moore explained weeks ago why Donald Trump would win, I believe he was brilliant — even prophetic.

If you ran into Moore, a far-left movie maker who has made millions of dollars in his chosen field, at the local 7-11, you might easily mistake him for an overweight, middle-aged guy getting a cup of coffee and some junk food on his way to his job at the local sheet metal shop. In his ball cap, t-shirt, and baggy blue jeans, he’s hardly anyone’s image of a Hollywood star.

Moore grew up the son of a Michigan automotive assembly line worker. The first major documentary movie he produced, Roger & Me, villainized U.S. automobile maker General Motors accusing that company’s upper level management of selling their U.S. workers down the river by outsourcing their jobs to Mexico. Moore understands blue collar working families. He came from one. And, he understands those men and women, not in some abstract way, but in terms of the frustration that many of them have felt for a long time.

And, that’s why he gets it so right in this clip. WARNING: Moore’s language is salty, to put it mildly, and unsuitable for the office or the ears of little ones. But, it is a pitch perfect echo of what you might hear on the shop floor or on the construction site:


Moore PERFECTLY captures the mood of a lot of people who just helped make Donald Trump the President-Elect of the United States. A lot of elites in Manhattan and Los Angeles don’t know anyone who feels this way. I know a lot of people who feel this way. But, you might ask, what about people who voted for Trump but who have a good job, and good insurance, and whose families are intact, and who don’t curse like sailors, and who are disgusted by the coarseness in Trump’s character. I can tell you that Moore still brilliantly captures the essence of the mood of many of these folks. They make up most of my friends and acquaintances here in a small town in a very red state. Many people who don’t fit the stereotype of the laid-off Rust Belt blue collar worker, got fed up with being patronized by elites who looked down their cultural noses at them as unsophisticated “deplorables” just because they oppose things such as same-sex marriage or safe-zones on college campuses, or are in favor of any number of politically incorrect beliefs or practices.

Don’t make the mistake of concluding that Moore is a fan of Trump. In the film, Michael Moore in TrumpLand, from which the clip above is taken, Moore ridicules Trump and makes it clear why he thinks Trump will be a disaster for America.

To reiterate what I stated above, my general opinion of Moore is negative, and that’s putting it mildly. I think his socialist politics are wrong and would be a disaster. I think his various crack-pot conspiracy theories are beyond wacky. But, he understands something about what a lot of “non-elite” Americans are feeling that most of the well-educated professionals who lead our society just don’t get.

And, I must confess, Moore’s paean to democracy in the middle of the video above brought me to the brink of tears. There is something powerfully just and right when, as Moore says, even though American men and women may lose everything they have, they still have “one thing: the one thing that doesn’t cost them a cent, and is guaranteed to them by the American Constitution: the right to vote…….it’s equalized on that day….. a millionaire has the same number of votes as the person without a job: one.”